This domain is a Michael A. Wills domain holdings property and is available for purchase. Contact us or submit your confidential offer to domains at willslaw.ca for consideration and response. Discover more domain properties for sale on our domains for sale listing page.
Quick-check the ahrefs domain rating and link profile: click here.
Minimum offer: $140.00 (USD)
Active Sites Not for Sale
Terminated.Law
Employment lawyer for: wrongful dismissal lawyer
Weclose.Law
Residential real estate lawyer for: buying a home or condo
Employer.Law
Management-side employment lawyer for: employment standards
More Top Domains for Sale
Latest Posts from Terminated.Law
- What to Do if Your Rights Are Violated: Steps to Protect Yourself and Take Actionby Michael Wills on December 20, 2024
Introduction to Rights When your workplace rights are violated, the experience can feel overwhelming. Whether it’s unpaid wages, discrimination, or wrongful dismissal, understanding the steps to protect yourself and take action is crucial. In Ontario, laws like the Employment Standards Act and […]
- Human Rights in the Workplace: Recognizing and Addressing Discriminationby Michael Wills on December 19, 2024
Introduction to Human Rights in the Workplace Every employee deserves to work in an environment free from discrimination. In Ontario, the Human Rights Code protects workers from unfair treatment based on personal characteristics, ensuring that workplaces remain inclusive and equitable. […]
- Robinson v Heinz Company: A Claim of Constructive Dismissalby Michael Wills on December 16, 2024
Constructive Dismissal in Leamington: A Closer Look BackgroundThis case stems from H.J. Heinz Company of Canada LP’s decision to close its Leamington, Ontario plant in 2014. Karen Robinson, a long-serving employee with nearly 40 years of tenure, was affected by the plant closure. Although Heinz […]
Latest Posts from Weclose.Law
- Ontario Land Transfer Tax and Closing Costsby Michael Wills on October 31, 2024
Learn about Ontario land transfer tax and closing costs. Weclose helps buyers understand LTT, rebates, and expenses for a transparent home-buying experience. The post Ontario Land Transfer Tax and Closing Costs first appeared on Weclose.
- Calculating Land Transfer Tax in Ontarioby Michael Wills on October 31, 2024
Calculating Land Transfer Tax in Ontario: Learn about tax rates, first-time buyer rebates, and closing costs today. Discover exemptions and rebates. The post Calculating Land Transfer Tax in Ontario first appeared on Weclose.
- Closing Costs for Ontario Homebuyersby Michael Wills on October 31, 2024
Learn about closing costs for Ontario homebuyers with Weclose. From legal fees to title insurance, we guide you through all the expenses for a smooth closing. The post Closing Costs for Ontario Homebuyers first appeared on Weclose.
Recent Decisions from Ontario Court of Appeal
- Bortoleti De Oliveira v. Ritchie, 2025 ONCA 299 (CanLII)on April 17, 2025
Family — Child support — Adjustment of child support — Shared parenting time — Income determination — Trial judge adjusted child support payable by the appellant for a specified period — Appellant argued trial judge failed to consider respondent’s income — Did the trial judge err in determining the respondent’s income as “zero or close to zero”? — Governing rule: Palpable and overriding error standard applied to factual findings in family law casesCivil procedure — Costs — Leave to appeal costs order — Divided success — Parties’ conduct — Trial judge ordered no costs due to divided success and parties’ conduct — Appellant sought leave to appeal costs order — Should leave to appeal be granted? — Governing rule: Costs awards are highly discretionary, particularly in family law cases, and require an error in principle to justify appellate intervention
- R. v. Bains, 2025 ONCA 301 (CanLII)on April 17, 2025
Criminal procedure — Appeals — Drug-related offences — Entrapment — Appellant convicted of drug trafficking — Appeal focused on whether the trial judge erred in inferring reasonable grounds for suspicion from the Agreed Statement of Facts — Did the trial judge err in applying the standard for entrapment? — Trial judge’s inference upheld — Appeal dismissedEvidence — Agreed Statement of Facts — Inference of subjective belief — Officer’s reasonable grounds to suspect drug trafficking inferred from context — No explicit reference to officer’s subjective belief in the Agreed Statement of Facts — Did the trial judge err in making this inference? — Trial judge’s analysis found to be reasonableRights and freedoms — Entrapment — Standard of proof — Appellant argued trial judge applied a less onerous standard for entrapment — Whether the trial judge’s approach to entrapment was legally correct — Court found no error in the trial judge’s application of the standard — Appeal dismissedCriminal procedure — Sentencing — Leave to appeal sentence — Appellant’s notice of appeal included a request for leave to appeal sentence — Leave to appeal sentence not pursued at the hearing — Sentence appeal dismissed
- Swan v. Duggan, 2025 ONCA 302 (CanLII)on April 17, 2025
Civil procedure — Abuse of process — Frivolous and vexatious claims — Appellant’s claim dismissed under Rule 2.1.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure as frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process — Whether the motion judge erred in dismissing the claim — Standard of review for discretionary decisions — Rule 2.1.01, Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194Torts — Conspiracy and defamation — Collateral attack — Appellant alleged conspiracy and defamation related to removal from condominium board and registration of lien — Motion judge found claims were a collateral attack on prior proceedings — Whether the motion judge erred in finding the claim constituted a collateral attack — Governing principles of collateral attack in civil litigationProperty — Statute of limitations — Claims of conspiracy and defamation — Appellant’s claims related to events in 2009 and 2013 — Motion judge held claims were statute-barred — Whether the claims were time-barred under applicable limitation periods — Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 24, Sched. BTorts — Vexatious litigation — Repetitive claims — Appellant’s statement of claim found to be repetitive and 81 pages in length — Whether the motion judge erred in characterizing the claim as vexatious — Hallmarks of vexatious proceedings in civil litigation